<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>nobel prize on fritzvd</title>
    <link>https://fritzvd.com/blog/tags/nobel-prize/</link>
    <description>Recent content in nobel prize on fritzvd</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fritzvd.com/blog/tags/nobel-prize/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>general frustrations on nobel-prize winning presidents</title>
      <link>https://fritzvd.com/blog/2009/10/21/general-frustrations-on-nobel-prize-winning-presidents/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://fritzvd.com/blog/2009/10/21/general-frustrations-on-nobel-prize-winning-presidents/</guid>
      <description>There is something which has been lingering in my mind for a while now. It has been brooding one US president ago, and has been set to full throttle frustration when a nobel prize was awarded a week-and-some ago.
US presidents have always, in the good-spirited leadership they posses, urged other ‘fragile states’ that nuclear power is something that comes with great responsibility, just like spidey-senses. And of course fragile states cannot handle that kind of responsibility.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
